| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shiwan Khan
   |
Posted - 2004.08.26 23:26:00 -
[1]
the first engagement in osht was VERY laggy for me. Scared the crap out of me too, those missiles were knocking me all over hell, didnt think i would get out but i did thankfully. the u-q battle was much better and apart from 2-3 smackish comments it was smack-free. We were actually having a nice little convorsation in local. Great fight SA. Much respect goes to you this day.
|
Shiwan Khan
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 23:26:00 -
[2]
the first engagement in osht was VERY laggy for me. Scared the crap out of me too, those missiles were knocking me all over hell, didnt think i would get out but i did thankfully. the u-q battle was much better and apart from 2-3 smackish comments it was smack-free. We were actually having a nice little convorsation in local. Great fight SA. Much respect goes to you this day.
|
Shiwan Khan
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 05:48:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Lardarz B'stard
Good stuff guys.
A very large scale battle and a respectable defeat of coalition forces by CA. ATUK took 2 battleship losses but our resolve remains strong.
I admire Aeryn's honesty and integrity in accepting responsibility here but have to say that it was not all her fault. There was much confusion as the lag played a major role, and our confidence got the better of us after the initial hammering we gave CA, meaning our forces were not at a full state of battle-preparedness for the second wave. If this was the CA plan, then well done - it worked. This time.
On a personal note, I would like to pay tribute to Jimmysav, Luther and Shakaz who all laid a sacrifice at the altar of freedom in the name of ATUK.
I look forward to the next installment....
Are you referring to the engagement in osht as the "hammering we gave CA"? Because if you are, you are sadly mistaken. That part of the fighting i do believe was an even 2:2 or 3:2 our favor. I think it was Tehel Necrona that also killed a tempest in u-q while this fighting in osht was occuring so if you factor that in it is 3:2 or 4:2. Now, as you people had more battleships than us we sat off the gate, when you jumped in we got 2 cruisers and managed to scramble a scorpion before you all warped out for a more favorable position. After that is where we got the majority of our kills.
I am sorry CA and SA for me having to post kills and everything in this thread, it was quite nice and well mannered until Lardarz posted. Again i would like to re-iterate that it was a great fight and little to no smack from both sides.
|
Shiwan Khan
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 05:48:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Lardarz B'stard
Good stuff guys.
A very large scale battle and a respectable defeat of coalition forces by CA. ATUK took 2 battleship losses but our resolve remains strong.
I admire Aeryn's honesty and integrity in accepting responsibility here but have to say that it was not all her fault. There was much confusion as the lag played a major role, and our confidence got the better of us after the initial hammering we gave CA, meaning our forces were not at a full state of battle-preparedness for the second wave. If this was the CA plan, then well done - it worked. This time.
On a personal note, I would like to pay tribute to Jimmysav, Luther and Shakaz who all laid a sacrifice at the altar of freedom in the name of ATUK.
I look forward to the next installment....
Are you referring to the engagement in osht as the "hammering we gave CA"? Because if you are, you are sadly mistaken. That part of the fighting i do believe was an even 2:2 or 3:2 our favor. I think it was Tehel Necrona that also killed a tempest in u-q while this fighting in osht was occuring so if you factor that in it is 3:2 or 4:2. Now, as you people had more battleships than us we sat off the gate, when you jumped in we got 2 cruisers and managed to scramble a scorpion before you all warped out for a more favorable position. After that is where we got the majority of our kills.
I am sorry CA and SA for me having to post kills and everything in this thread, it was quite nice and well mannered until Lardarz posted. Again i would like to re-iterate that it was a great fight and little to no smack from both sides.
|
Shiwan Khan
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 06:06:00 -
[5]
Well dude, is it really soooooo difficult to say "good fight on both sides, no smacktalk i enjoyed it. thanks for the fun." as opposed to "after the initial hammering we gave CA blah blah blah blah"
That little hammering comment to me sounded like an attempt to try and say that "even though they won this time we are still 10x better blah blah blah"
(my second paragraph is me obviously reading between the lines and inferring a bit, but i would be really shocked if i was off at all)
|
Shiwan Khan
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 06:06:00 -
[6]
Well dude, is it really soooooo difficult to say "good fight on both sides, no smacktalk i enjoyed it. thanks for the fun." as opposed to "after the initial hammering we gave CA blah blah blah blah"
That little hammering comment to me sounded like an attempt to try and say that "even though they won this time we are still 10x better blah blah blah"
(my second paragraph is me obviously reading between the lines and inferring a bit, but i would be really shocked if i was off at all)
|
Shiwan Khan
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 06:09:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Mituno Sakai
Can we have some estimate of total number of ships involved?
And does that area have more server ressources?
I know our gang was around 35 with about 18 battleships. I do not know the enemy's fleet size but i do know that they had over 25 battleships. Especially in osht (where i lost my wasps  ) i jumped in osht after our fleet had already been formed up for some time but i got the impression on TS that they had roughly equal numbers in u-q with 10 more pilots (according to map) coming up from DSS and 7 pilots (again according to map) coming up from hed-gp.
|
Shiwan Khan
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 06:09:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Mituno Sakai
Can we have some estimate of total number of ships involved?
And does that area have more server ressources?
I know our gang was around 35 with about 18 battleships. I do not know the enemy's fleet size but i do know that they had over 25 battleships. Especially in osht (where i lost my wasps ) i jumped in osht after our fleet had already been formed up for some time but i got the impression on TS that they had roughly equal numbers in u-q with 10 more pilots (according to map) coming up from DSS and 7 pilots (again according to map) coming up from hed-gp.
|
Shiwan Khan
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 15:01:00 -
[9]
Why dont you like me max? i love you 
|
Shiwan Khan
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 15:01:00 -
[10]
Why dont you like me max? i love you
|
Shiwan Khan
|
Posted - 2004.08.28 02:18:00 -
[11]
One of my alts is a name of a character in the movie "The Shadow" 
|
Shiwan Khan
|
Posted - 2004.08.28 02:18:00 -
[12]
One of my alts is a name of a character in the movie "The Shadow"
|
| |
|